Founder working visual · MVP scope frozen · July 13, 2026

Not another SaaS company.

The neutral acceleration layer between property managers, their data, and every tool or AI agent they choose.

We make fragmented operating data trustworthy, portable, safe to use, and ready to power better decisions. Clients keep running property management. We help accelerate everything around it.

M1 and M2 proven · Decisions 21–64 canonical · M3 recovery active

The company thesis

Sit in the middle. Make every system more useful.

Direction approved

There will not be one permanent software winner in property management. The stack changes too quickly. The durable position is the independent data and acceleration layer that lets clients adopt the best tools without rebuilding their business every time.

InputsEvery system

PMS, pricing, operations, guest messaging, finance, CRM, documents, spreadsheets, media, email, Slack, and future tools.

Our positionTrusted operating data

Identity, history, evidence, decisions, permissions, APIs, agents, exports, and beautiful information surfaces.

OutcomesEvery accelerator

Owner intelligence, onboarding, content, websites, social, CRM, compliance administration, bookkeeping support, and capabilities not invented yet.

NeutralIntegrate the winners. Replace a tool only when the market leaves a real gap.
Client controlledThe client can always view, export, transform, repoint, or build on their data.
AI readyAPIs, webhooks, events, service identities, and agent tools are core infrastructure.
Service enabledHigh touch work becomes reusable mappings, controls, interfaces, and software.
The promise If a client wants to move from Streamline to Guesty tomorrow, their information layer, workflows, history, and accelerators should not need to be rebuilt.

Business model

A barbell. Nothing in the mushy middle.

Locked
Premium arm

Build alongside the operator

High cost, high touch, tightly scoped design partnerships for operators with enough complexity and value at stake.

  • Standard implementation: $40,000
  • Optional partnership: $5,000 monthly
  • Custom complexity is separately priced
  • Every engagement must strengthen the common core
Do not enter$1K to $3K managed serviceToo much human obligation for too little margin
Future utility arm

Data independence at low cost

A highly automated layer that captures, synchronizes, exposes, and exports the client's data with optional accelerators.

  • Low friction and client controlled
  • Broad connector and export surface
  • À la carte information and workflow tools
  • Built only after the premium core repeats
What the corrected pricing research changed

The original premium price was based too heavily on delivery cost and consulting analogues. The corrected model counts only value that can reach client cash flow. A typical 75 property manager is usually too small. Healthy operators near 250 to 300 properties are the practical center unless a smaller company has a major migration, hiring, acquisition, or risk trigger. Lake Tahoe Accommodations is a design partner candidate, not proof of the final market.

The first wedge

Property Knowledge Reliability

Roam Free MVP

Before dashboards or AI accelerators can be trusted, the company needs one reliable property knowledge layer. The first product proves that scattered facts can be captured, reconciled, certified, surfaced, and exported without losing history.

01
Standardize onboarding

Map every client's unique sources and terminology into a wide, extensible data model.

02
Maintain continual sync

Keep business information current across PMS, pricing, operations, AI, documents, and human managed sources.

03
Surface operating intelligence

Combine Streamline, PriceLabs, RevA, Conduit AI, Breezeway, Slack, and other systems into a real time owner view.

04
Unlock accelerators

Reuse governed data for listings, captions, social content, websites, CRM, bookkeeping support, and later workflows.

Test tenantRoam FreeProve function safely on our own portfolio first.
First external design partnerLake Tahoe Accommodations120 plus units, existing Conduit AI, complex source history, strict forensic preservation.
Repeatable marketQualified operatorsOnly after the common model, delivery economics, and willingness to pay are proven.
LTA constraint Current production data is not assumed correct. Original snapshots, later changes, mistakes, corrections, evidence, approvals, and published outputs must remain independently reconstructable.

Build status

The foundation works. Live product proof comes next.

M3 recovery active

The strategy, protected delivery system, fabricated vertical slice, publication-safety runtime, and Decisions 21–64 are complete. The build is now crossing from safe infrastructure into the first real Property Data Health capability.

Current safety boundaryNo client data, live observation, external model, source writeback, LTA access, or production deployment is authorized yet.
CompleteProduct and architecture

Business thesis, barbell model, wide data foundation, AI safety, portability, scorecard model, and the read-only MVP are locked.

CompleteProtected engineering foundation

Leases, exact-tree evidence, independent review, serial merge control, post-merge health, and fail-closed delivery gates are operating.

M1 · S0Fabricated vertical slice

A deterministic property fact can move through capture, evidence, governance, API, export, and a thin audit surface using synthetic data only.

M2 · N0Publication safety runtime

The bounded public-page observation runtime is merged and verified. It remains non-network by default and has consumed no live request slot.

M3 · ActiveContract authority recovery

One isolated recovery driver is rebuilding the M3 authorization boundary from immutable Git evidence after overlapping work was quarantined.

QueuedProperty Data Health pilot

Identity, approved observations, governed location, scorecard, exports, reliability tests, and the three-snapshot five-day shadow run remain ahead.

Why M3 is in recovery

Two tasks briefly overlapped on the same recovery work. Their uncommitted implementation was quarantined rather than trusted. A new sole driver is auditing from a fresh isolated copy before making any change. This is a delivery-control incident, not a client-data incident.

Honest MVP statusWe have proven the platform can be built safely. We have not yet proven the Roam Free data product, the scorecard, the five-day shadow cadence, or external willingness to pay.

Approved architecture

A wide base with a small, stable kernel.

Read the full blueprint →

The commercial wedge stays narrow. The underlying data foundation must be wide enough to support new clients, sources, verticals, AI models, and services without redesigning the platform.

1Immutable raw versionsWhat each source actually said
2Fact candidatesPreserved claims, never silent overwrites
3Canonical decisionsExplicit authority, evidence, time, and approver
4Derived artifactsDashboards, content, exports, and agent context
No last write wins A source update creates a new claim. It does not silently replace truth. Corrections supersede prior decisions and trigger impact review across downstream outputs.

The client surface

One supported scorecard. Infinite governed versions.

Decisions 48–56 approved

We provide a beautiful standard scorecard and a controlled customization layer. Clients can rearrange it themselves, ask Claude to propose a unique version, or build through our API without forking the platform or bypassing data policy.

01
Platform-certified base

Supported identity, data health, freshness, conflict, provenance, access, and audit components.

02
Client customization overlay

Layout, labels, branding, filters, thresholds, audience views, and approved metrics remain portable and versioned.

03
Validated publication

Every change receives a preview, policy check, cost estimate, compatibility test, approval, and rollback point.

Visual builderDrag, resize, filter, and compose supported components.

The future visual studio edits the same portable declarative scorecard document used everywhere else. It never hides provenance, freshness, conflicts, access rules, certification state, or audit history.

Claude or another AIDescribe the scorecard in plain language.

An approved agent sees only authorized fields and components, then returns a typed patch. It cannot directly alter the published scorecard. The client reviews the exact diff before publication.

Developer and APIExport, edit, validate, and publish schema-as-code.

REST/OpenAPI and JSON documents let a client build any interface while the governed query compiler enforces workspace, row, field, cost, and workload boundaries.

CertifiedWe own and maintain it
Client-governedWe support the runtime; client owns meaning
PluginIsolated, explicit support boundary
MVP truth The first standard scorecard is Property Data Health for Austin East Bird. Revenue, pricing, guest experience, operations, marketing, and owner-performance modules remain visibly “Not evaluated” until their source contracts are genuinely live.

AI safety and private compute

Enable agents without surrendering control.

Core product strength

The platform should encourage clients to build with their own or our AI agents, while making safe behavior the default. For the most sensitive workloads, local models can operate inside the client's controlled environment so frontier labs never receive the data.

PublicExternal models allowed

Approved public facts and published content.

InternalPolicy controlled

Operational context with purpose and user checks.

SensitivePrivate by default

Minimized, redacted, or routed to client controlled compute.

RestrictedNever leaves the data plane

Local models and purpose bound access only.

Separate facts from inferenceAI guesses retain model, confidence, evidence, expiration, and uncertainty.
Certify by audience and purposeA fact approved for an owner dashboard is not automatically safe for a guest message.
Fail closed on riskStale or uncertain safety, access, policy, and identity facts block high risk outputs.
Never turn secrets into knowledgeCodes and credentials are purpose bound retrievals, not reusable prompt or search content.
How token and agent spend is governed

Every execution is attributed to workspace, actor, workflow, purpose, provider, model, tokens, tools, storage, local compute, and payer. Platform-funded, client-funded, and bring-your-own agents share budgets, warnings, hard stops, per-run ceilings, model restrictions, and auditable escalation rules.

Competition and moat

The competitors are layers, not one company.

Systems of recordStreamline, Guesty, Hostaway, OwnerRez

They own core workflows and can expand into analytics or integrations. We win by remaining portable across them and making migration less dangerous.

Data and integrationSnowflake, Fivetran, Hightouch, iPaaS tools

They provide infrastructure but usually do not deliver the STR specific canonical model, evidence, stewardship, operating controls, and acceleration partnership.

AI and automationConduit AI, HostBuddy, point agents, internal builds

They consume or create operational information. We make that information governed, safe, portable, and reusable across agents.

ServicesConsultancies, virtual assistants, agencies, fractional teams

They can solve workflows manually. We must turn repeated work into a reusable client controlled foundation instead of accumulating labor.

WeakMore features
UsefulConnector coverage
StrongCanonical decisions and provenance
StrongerClient trust, embedded controls, and historical graph
DurableFaster safe adoption of whatever comes next
Nvidia is the closer strategic analogy Enable the ecosystem, stay beneath fast moving applications, make switching and building easier, and enter an application layer only when the market leaves an important gap.

Execution sequence

Wrap, shadow, compare, repoint, retire.

No greenfield rewrite
Phase 0Discover every Roam Free source

Inventory OwnerRez, Breezeway, Google Drive, Docs, Sheets, Supabase, Notion, Conduit, Airbnb, Vrbo, the direct site, onboarding files, guidebooks, manuals, email, Slack, local files, and every forgotten source. Unknown and unconnected sources remain visible.

Phase 1Build the isolated Roam Free foundation

Create permanent identities, immutable capture, the evidence vault, policies, decision history, and complete export without production writeback.

Phase 2Wrap what already works

Reuse the proven fact engine, dossiers, claim tracing, approvals, write guards, readback verification, and receipts. Wrap vendor specific code as adapters.

Phase 3Shadow and reconcile

Run the new canonical model beside current systems, compare every fact and artifact, preserve disagreements, and time the human work.

Phase 4Launch the read only audit

Show sources, freshness, evidence, conflicts, unknowns, inferences, certifications, published diffs, and a complete export in a beautiful owner ready surface.

Phase 5Govern Roam Free outputs

Use certified facts for listings, captions, Conduit knowledge, and the operating dashboard. Add controlled writes only after explicit approval, canary scope, readback, receipts, and rollback.

Phase 6Deploy LTA in forensic read only mode

Certify baselines and reconstruct history before any new system writeback. Repoint one consumer at a time only after parity and correctness are proven.

Roam Free acceptance gates

Function must be proven before commercialization.

01

Every known source inventoried. Unconnected sources remain visible.

02

Every active property has a permanent ID and verified external mappings.

03

Selected source captures are immutable, hashed, and replayable.

04

At least 95% of the target fact catalog is populated or explicitly unknown or conflicted.

05

Every displayed or exported value traces to evidence and a decision.

06

Authority, sensitivity, audience, freshness, and retention are defined for every target field.

07

Restricted data egress to external models fails closed.

08

No unresolved critical safety, access, policy, or identity conflicts.

09

A complete export and independent restore both succeed.

10

All setup, review, correction, and maintenance time is measured.

Important distinctionRoam Free proves technical function and operating safety. It does not prove external willingness to pay.

Evidence room

Read the analysis behind every major decision.

Open all reports →
Current state

LTA workflow and data shape audit

What to reuse, generalize, wrap, retire, and build without rewriting proven code.

Read audit
Commercial thesis

Business plan research

Product fit, competition, SWOT, target clients, moat, risks, and validation roadmap.

Read report
Pricing

Corrected pricing strategy

Buyer value, delivery economics, Standard scope, qualification, and kill criteria.

Read report
Comparable companies

Service enabled platform cases

Veeva, Athenahealth, Celonis, ServiceTitan, failure patterns, and first ten client gates.

Read report
Market and standards

Products, tools, security, and certifications

Market alternatives, implementation accelerators, standards, safety, and client readiness.

Read report
Cross vertical proof

Operating partner analogues

What worked in healthcare, restaurants, trades, construction, employment, finance, and ecommerce.

Read report
Original evidence

Search the source library

Go directly from the analysis to original filings, documentation, standards, company material, and reporting.

Browse sources

Current critical path

Recover M3 safely, then build the first real product slice.

In progress

M1, M2, and decision reconciliation are complete. The shortest safe path to the MVP is now one controlled sequence with no parallel mutation inside the M3 authority lane.

1Close M3 authority recovery

Rebuild the immutable contract authority, pass adversarial tests and two independent reviews, then merge through the protected controller.

2Build the M3 property slice

Give Austin East Bird a permanent identity, ingest only approved observations, and govern exact location and source conflicts.

3Ship the client surface

Render the mobile Property Data Health scorecard with provenance, blockers, recommendations, and JSON, CSV, and evidence exports.

4Run shadow acceptance

Pass isolation, retention, audit, failure, backup, and restore tests, then complete three authorized snapshots across five days.